Biblical Hebrew Forum

["kenneth greifer" <greifer AT hotmail.com>]

I am not a scholar, and I have not understood anything in the argument about 
Rolf's dissertation or whatever the discussion has been about. I am just 
curious about how scholars debate normally. Is the debate that you've been 
doing on B-Hebrew the normal way that scholars discuss controversial 
subjects or is this somehow different? Also, when someone has a 
controversial opinion like Rolf, don't scholars analyze the ideas right away 
because it sounds like his ideas have been around for a while and no one has 
analyzed them. Maybe I did not understand the discussion, but it sounds like 
this to me.

Kenneth Greifer
USA

_________________________________________________________________
Live Search Maps – find all the local information you need, right when you 
need it. http://maps.live.com/?icid=hmtag2&FORM=MGAC01