b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Vadim Cherny" <VadimCherny AT mail.ru>
- To: "Chris and Nel" <wattswestmaas AT eircom.net>, "B-Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.Ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Gesenius on Femininity
- Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:44:53 +0300
Torah is from tur, to instruct, admonish. Suffix hey is not feminine, but
the suffix of result, such as in cotev - ctivah. Thus Torah - instruction,
admonition.
You can see other examples at
http://vadimcherny.org/hebrew/affix_hey_direction.htm
Basically, there are several different suffixes hey, and they have nothing
to do with feminine.
Vadim Cherny
> This got me thinking about a few words that had no apparent reason for
being
> in the feminine. One such word was the obvious -- Torah. And so I wonder
> whether there would be agreement to the following 'idea' (based on
> Gesenius's reasoning) that while this concept was masterful, strong,
> dominant and hence a masculine ideal; it is rather by absolute contrast a
> productive, sustaining, nourishing concept! and hence feminine. (All this
> assuming that Torah is understood along the lines that it means nore
> teaching and guiding and instruction rather than the negative concept of
> 'Law' as assumed in some circles)
>
> What are your thoughts on this?
>
> Chris Watts
>
>
>
-
[b-hebrew] Gesenius on Femininity,
Chris and Nel, 09/23/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Gesenius on Femininity,
Vadim Cherny, 09/24/2006
-
Message not available
- Re: [b-hebrew] Gesenius on Femininity, Vadim Cherny, 09/25/2006
-
Message not available
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Gesenius on Femininity,
Vadim Cherny, 09/24/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] Gesenius on Femininity, Peter Kirk, 09/25/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
[b-hebrew] Gesenius on Femininity,
Chris and Nel, 09/25/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] Gesenius on Femininity, Peter Kirk, 09/25/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] Gesenius on Femininity, K Randolph, 09/25/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.