b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Yigal Levin <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il>
- To: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] oral law
- Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 01:04:36 +0200
----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Kirk" <peter AT qaya.org>
Of course it doesn't. That's because such matters, like so many details
of religious practice, are not divinely specified. If this verse, I
suppose you mean Deuteronomy 6:8, is intended to be taken literally at
all, God did not choose to specify exactly how these commandments were
to be tied to hands and foreheads because this was a matter for each
person, or each community, to decide for themselves. And that is what
happened; one community's decision on these details has become
traditional Jewish teaching and practice. But what matters to God is not
the details the principle behind it.
Peter, that's a (Pauline) Christian view, not a (Rabbinic) Jewish one. Of course I have no intention of arguing about anyone else's religious views, but the Jewish one is basically, that God would not have given so many rules if he had not intended them to be followed. Halakhah, the "legal" part of the Oral Torah, spells out just how the rules are supposed to be followed. Something like by-legistlation specifying what a constitution states in only general terms. But since God, unlike the human authors of a constitution, is "perfect" and omniscient, He would not have left things to chance. And so the Torah "must" have all possibilities already "built in". A very literal understanding of this, such as the one that Shoshanna holds, would be that God actually prepared Moses for every possibility that would arise in the future, and he passed these down to the elders, who passed them to the scribes, who passed them to the rabbis of "the Great Assembly", the later Sanhedrin. A less literal interpretation is that God taught Moses the rules by which to apply the Torah and gave him the authority to do so, and this is what he passed down.
Yigal
-
Re: [b-hebrew] oral law
, (continued)
-
Re: [b-hebrew] oral law,
Lisbeth S. Fried, 06/23/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] oral law, Harold Holmyard, 06/23/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] oral law, Harold Holmyard, 06/23/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] oral law,
Shoshanna Walker, 06/23/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] oral law,
Peter Kirk, 06/23/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] oral law, Brak, 06/23/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] oral law, Harold Holmyard, 06/23/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] oral law,
Peter Kirk, 06/23/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] oral law, Shoshanna Walker, 06/23/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] oral law,
Shoshanna Walker, 06/23/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] oral law,
Peter Kirk, 06/24/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] oral law,
Yigal Levin, 06/24/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] oral law,
Peter Kirk, 06/24/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] oral law,
Yigal Levin, 06/24/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] oral law, Joel Stucki, 06/24/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] oral law, Peter Kirk, 06/25/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] oral law,
Yigal Levin, 06/24/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] oral law,
Peter Kirk, 06/24/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] oral law,
Yigal Levin, 06/24/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] oral law,
Peter Kirk, 06/24/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] oral law, Shoshanna Walker, 06/24/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] oral law, Shoshanna Walker, 06/25/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] oral law, Karl Randolph, 06/25/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] oral law,
Karl Randolph, 06/25/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] oral law,
Brak, 06/25/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] oral law, Peter Kirk, 06/25/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] oral law,
Brak, 06/25/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] oral law,
Lisbeth S. Fried, 06/23/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.