Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Why Semitic languages had no written vowels?

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Kevin Riley" <klriley AT alphalink.com.au>
  • To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>, <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Why Semitic languages had no written vowels?
  • Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 10:38:30 +1000 (AUS Eastern Standard Time)

The suggestion that the vowels may have been left out specifically because
they were variable is a good suggestion also. If the Canaanite dialects were
like most modern languages [Arabic is a good example] then it is likely that
the consonants differed in predictable ways but not necessarily the vowels.
As, in context, the vowels for any dialect could be supplied with a
reasonable degree of accuracy, writing them may have actually been a
disadvantage. I am not convinced that having a grapheme that may have
multiple pronunciations is in any way an advance on not having a grapheme at
all. There are still modern languages which do not indicate all the vowels,
or fail to distinguish between different vowels, as they are predictable
from context. Which shows that even people who usually write vowels do not
feel the need to write them just because they exist.

Kevin Riley

***************************

Karl,

For once I almost agree with you. There is a method known as
speed-writing in which the vowels are dropped in order to facilitate such
activities as note-taking. Out of context many of these "words" would be
unintelligible since they could possibly be one of a large number of
words. In context, however, the meaning is generally clear. English, in
particular however, is highly dependent upon vowels. 's' could be 'is'
or 'so' or 'say.' 'I' is nothing but a vowel. Therefore, I would give
your statement a "qualified" approval.

george
gfsomsel
___________





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page