b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Re: [b-hebrew] Shishak

From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
To: Uri Hurwitz <uhurwitz AT yahoo.com>
Cc: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Shishak
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 17:10:53 +0100

On 22/08/2004 23:36, Uri Hurwitz wrote:

*/Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>/* wrote:

>
>

"To return to this question, David Rohl lists Sheshonk....."

When it comes to (ancient) Egyptian matters you refer again and
again to Rohl. Do you know any established Egyptologist who takes
his work seriously?

Uri

That is not the point. I am quoting Rohl's book as a convenient source of data which needs explanation. If Rohl or his associates have found data which seems to contradict "established" Egyptology, this establishment needs to provide explanations for this data, and not write it off by ad hominem arguments against its source.

--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/

[b-hebrew] book, Yigal Levin, 08/19/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] book, Martin Shields, 08/19/2004
  - [b-hebrew] Shishak (was:book), Yigal Levin, 08/22/2004
    - Re: [b-hebrew] Shishak, Peter Kirk, 08/22/2004
      - Re: [b-hebrew] Shishak, Uri Hurwitz, 08/22/2004
        
        Re: [b-hebrew] Shishak, Peter Kirk, 08/26/2004
      - Re: [b-hebrew] Shishak, Yigal Levin, 08/22/2004
        
        Re: [b-hebrew] Shishak, Brian Roberts, 08/23/2004