b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Noam Eitan <bhebrew AT yahoo.com>
- To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] The islands
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org> wrote:
On 07/06/2004 12:39, VC wrote:
>Dear Listmembers,
>
>Just wanted to share a thought. What always puzzled me in the Tanakh - and
>this turn is most often encountered in Isaiah - is the reference to certain
>islands. They are clearly hostile to the Jews, ...
>
>Where does it say this?
Many of the 36 references to Islands in the Tanakh are hostile, particularly
in the prophets. But it's not so much that there is any evidence they were
hostile to the Judeans, but rather that the prophets were hostile to them,
and even this hostility was not specific but often part of a generalized
Yahwistic hostility to other nations who will be taught a lesson one day
about Yahweh's superiority. I think Jeremiah 31:10 is emblematic - 'Islands'
stand for the remotest corners of the earth (and Yahweh's message and score
settling will reach EVEN as far as the islands.) - Noam Eitan, Brooklyn, NY
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger
>From bhebrew AT yahoo.com Mon Jun 7 20:42:23 2004
Return-Path: <bhebrew AT yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from web60110.mail.yahoo.com (web60110.mail.yahoo.com
[216.109.118.89])
by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id D3FF520016
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 20:42:22 -0400
(EDT)
Message-ID: <20040608004222.91273.qmail AT web60110.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [24.90.81.252] by web60110.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Mon, 07 Jun 2004 17:42:22 PDT
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Noam Eitan <bhebrew AT yahoo.com>
To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
In-Reply-To: <1086589745.26942.197891221 AT webmail.messagingengine.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.4
Subject: [b-hebrew] Re: Ashera: ?Ashtoret Tzidon
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Hebrew Bible List <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 00:42:23 -0000
Patrina <patrina AT bestmail.us> wrote:
>LOL. Well Noam, maybe you're the person to ask whether Ashtoret of
Tzidon (1 Kings 11:5) is the same as Ashera, Queen of Heaven?
Ashtoret of the Zidonians appears 9 times in the TaNaKh and is different from
the Canaanite Ashera (40 times) - different locals, different cults,
completely different lexemes (it only looks similar in English.)
>I think there's a word play on the fertility goddess in Deut 7:13, 28:4, 18,
>and
51, where "ashterot tzon" is translated as 'flocks of your sheep and
goats' in my Stone edition Tanach. As far as I can tell, this occurs
nowhere else,
True.
>only in Deuteronomy in connection with fertility. As is
fitting for an all-powerful deity, YHWH subsumes the attributes of the
surrounding deities through the pen of the the Deuteronomist in this
example (I think).
Either that, or the expression lost its pagan connotation by then. But I
wouldn't call it a word play, I don't believe these 4 references consciously
make pagan allusions of some kind.
Noam Eitan, Brooklyn, NY
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger
>From kwrandolph AT email.com Mon Jun 7 20:59:05 2004
Return-Path: <kwrandolph AT email.com>
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com
(webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.67])
by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF5F20016
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 20:59:05 -0400
(EDT)
Received: from wfilter.us4.outblaze.com (wfilter.us4.outblaze.com
[205.158.62.180])
by webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with QMQP id
8DAD518011E5
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 00:59:04 +0000
(GMT)
X-OB-Received: from unknown (205.158.62.182)
by wfilter.us4.outblaze.com; 8 Jun 2004 00:58:26 -0000
Received: by ws3-6.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 55A281CE304; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 00:59:04 +0000 (GMT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404)
Received: from [66.81.118.26] by ws3-6.us4.outblaze.com with http for
kwrandolph AT email.com; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 19:59:04 -0500
From: "Karl Randolph" <kwrandolph AT email.com>
To: "Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 19:59:04 -0500
Subject: RE: [b-hebrew] Migdal-Eber
X-Originating-Ip: 66.81.118.26
X-Originating-Server: ws3-6.us4.outblaze.com
Message-Id: <20040608005904.55A281CE304 AT ws3-6.us4.outblaze.com>
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Hebrew Bible List <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 00:59:06 -0000
I understand this term to mean to arrive, in other words, not just to come,
but to come and be present. The hiphil is causative, to cause to arrive, i.e.
to bring.
Karl W. Randolph.
----- Original Message -----
From: "wattswestmaas" <wattswestmaas AT eircom.net>
>
> Maurice can you briefly explain this emmendation by Dahood.
>
> . By contrast 'atâ is used only twenty times, twenty-one times if one
> accepts the emendation proposed by Dahood for Ps 74:9, "Our signs we do not
> see, there is no longer a prophet, and no one has "come" ('ittanû > 'atanû)
> who knows how long." Eighteen of the twenty are in the Qal and two in the
> Hiphil (Isa 21:14; Jer 12:9) with the meaning "to bring."
--
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
-
[b-hebrew] The islands,
VC, 06/07/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] The islands,
Peter Kirk, 06/07/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] The islands,
Noam Eitan, 06/07/2004
-
RE: [b-hebrew] The islands,
Reinier de Blois, 06/08/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] The islands,
VC, 06/08/2004
-
RE: [b-hebrew] The islands,
Reinier de Blois, 06/08/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] The islands,
Peter Kirk, 06/08/2004
- RE: [b-hebrew] The islands, Reinier de Blois, 06/08/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] The islands, VC, 06/08/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] The islands,
Peter Kirk, 06/08/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] The islands,
VC, 06/08/2004
- RE: [b-hebrew] The islands, Reinier de Blois, 06/08/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] The islands, VC, 06/08/2004
-
RE: [b-hebrew] The islands,
Reinier de Blois, 06/08/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] The islands,
VC, 06/08/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] The islands, Harold R. Holmyard III, 06/08/2004
-
RE: [b-hebrew] The islands,
Reinier de Blois, 06/08/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] The islands,
Noam Eitan, 06/07/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] The islands,
Peter Kirk, 06/07/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.