Biblical Hebrew Forum

["UUC" <unikom AT paco.net>]

Dear Harold,

>>The form )eT that appears twice in Isa 53:9 is the NORMAL form for
>>  the preposition "with" when it is preceded by a maqqeph.

No, it is not. Maqqeph has altogether different meaning, only pointing to
common semantics, nothing else.


Sincerely,

Vadim Cherny


> Dear Vadim,
>
> My statements have been coming straight out of authoritative grammars
> and lexicons. The same form can mean two different things, so Genesis
> 1:4 does not prove anything against what I'm saying.
>
> Yours,
> Harold Holmyard
> >Dear Harold,
> >
> >You may want to review Genesis 1:4 to realize that this statement is
> >incorrect.
> >
> >
> >>  2) The form )eT that appears twice in Isa 53:9 is the normal form for
> >>  the preposition "with" when it is preceded by a maqqeph. See
> >>  Brown-Driver-Briggs lexicon under the preposition )eT, where that is
> >>  the first fact given about the word.
> >
> >
> >Sincerely,
> >
> >Vadim Cherny
> >_______________________________________________
> >b-hebrew mailing list
> >b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> >http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>