Biblical Hebrew Forum

["Harold R. Holmyard III" <hholmyard AT ont.com>]

Dear Vadim,

My statements have been coming straight out of authoritative grammars 
and lexicons. The same form can mean two different things, so Genesis 
1:4 does not prove anything against what I'm saying.

                                Yours,
                                Harold Holmyard
> Dear Harold,
>
> You may want to review Genesis 1:4 to realize that this statement is 
> incorrect.
>
>
> >  2) The form )eT that appears twice in Isa 53:9 is the normal form for
> >  the preposition "with" when it is preceded by a maqqeph. See
> >  Brown-Driver-Briggs lexicon under the preposition )eT, where that is
> >  the first fact given about the word.
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Vadim Cherny
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew