b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: furuli AT online.no
- To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53
- Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 18:12:52 +0200
Dear Dave,
This is a strange post because no named person is addressed. Because an exchange between Vadim and myself was copied, it seems that I am the addressee. But then the post becomes even more strange, because I quoted the words of the doctoral dissertation of Dr Cook, and said that I agreed. There was no claim that the question was finally settled. There are many valuable thoughts in the Archives which can be taken into account, but it is even better to study the text of the Tanakh itself.
Best regards
Rolf
Rolf Furuli
University of Oslo
I suggest you spend some serious time in the archives before making such a
statement. There have been beaucoup discussions of this very question and
it's far from settled. Don't try to treat it as though it's a done deal,
because it most definitely isn't.
On Sunday 16 May 2004 01:43, unikom AT paco.net wrote:
Dear Rolf,
You can't be serious on that. Out of head, 90% of wa's reverse the tense.
Those that don't represent probably the same percentage of the erroneous
tenses as encountered in the verbs without wa. Wa's overwhelmingly do
reverse the tense, wouldn't you agree with this?
>QATAL and WEQATAL: "In
conclusion, there is no evidence that qatal and weqatal are separate
and independent conjugations or that they have different origins.
I agree that there is no difference between the two forms - weqatal
is a qatal with the conjunction WAW prefixed.<
Best regards,
Vadim
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
--
Dave Washburn
http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur
Learning about Christianity from a non-Christian
is like getting a kiss over the telephone.
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53
, (continued)
- Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, Peter Kirk, 05/15/2004
- [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, unikom, 05/15/2004
-
[b-hebrew] Isaiah 53,
unikom, 05/15/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, furuli, 05/15/2004
- [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, unikom, 05/16/2004
-
[b-hebrew] Isaiah 53,
unikom, 05/16/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, furuli, 05/16/2004
-
[b-hebrew] Isaiah 53,
unikom, 05/16/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, furuli, 05/16/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53,
Dave Washburn, 05/16/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, furuli, 05/16/2004
-
[b-hebrew] Isaiah 53,
unikom, 05/16/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, furuli, 05/16/2004
-
[b-hebrew] Isaiah 53,
unikom, 05/16/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53,
Dave Washburn, 05/16/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53,
Peter Kirk, 05/16/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, Dave Washburn, 05/16/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53,
Peter Kirk, 05/16/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53,
Dave Washburn, 05/16/2004
- [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, unikom, 05/16/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, Unikom-Ug Corp., 05/16/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53,
Karl Randolph, 05/17/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, jason, 05/17/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.