b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: unikom AT paco.net
- To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53
- Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 08:24:16 +0300 (EEST)
Dear Rolf,
Perhaps I missed something...
Both verbs in 52:14 are in the past, clear and simple. Why future?
Best regards,
Vadim
"52:14 puts
the suffering in the *past*"? I note that the LXX has future verbs in
this verse, one translates the Hebrew QATAL and the other translates
a Hebrew substantive. I take v. 14 as simple future, just as does the
LXX. Why should I not?
-
[b-hebrew] Isaiah 53
, (continued)
- [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, unikom, 05/14/2004
- [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, unikom, 05/14/2004
- [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, unikom, 05/14/2004
- [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, , 05/14/2004
-
[b-hebrew] Isaiah 53,
unikom, 05/15/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, Peter Kirk, 05/15/2004
- [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, unikom, 05/15/2004
-
[b-hebrew] Isaiah 53,
unikom, 05/15/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, furuli, 05/15/2004
- [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, unikom, 05/16/2004
-
[b-hebrew] Isaiah 53,
unikom, 05/16/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, furuli, 05/16/2004
-
[b-hebrew] Isaiah 53,
unikom, 05/16/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, furuli, 05/16/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53,
Dave Washburn, 05/16/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, furuli, 05/16/2004
-
[b-hebrew] Isaiah 53,
unikom, 05/16/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, furuli, 05/16/2004
-
[b-hebrew] Isaiah 53,
unikom, 05/16/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53,
Dave Washburn, 05/16/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53, Peter Kirk, 05/16/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53,
Dave Washburn, 05/16/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.