b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
Re: [b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph
- From: "Charles David Isbell" <cisbell AT cox.net>
- To: "b-hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>, "Harold R. Holmyard III" <hholmyard AT ont.com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:39:10 -0600
I think we should read carefully what Yigal said. "Isaiah DID NOT have Jesus
in mind." Then we can compare the final sentence of Harold Holmyard's
disagreement with him: "Isaiah would not have known the Messiah as 'Jesus.'"
It is doctrine in Christian circles to believe that the NT is authoritative
and that a passage from I Peter proves beyond doubt that Isaiah wrote with
Jesus of Nazareth in mind. It is standard in my circle as a Jew to take
Isaiah's own words seriously as reference to an eighth century crisis,
during which Isaiah was advising Ahaz about a Syro-Israelite threat. How his
words leap frog over 750 years and come to attain a first century CE context
that holds for all time is not a discussion I wish to have on this list.
Re. the Talmud, why not visit a local synagogue? Virtually every one has a
copy of the Talmud, and most will have an English translation of at least
part of it.
Charles David Isbell
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph
, (continued)
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph,
Peter Kirk, 02/23/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph,
Jonathan Walther, 02/23/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph,
Peter Kirk, 02/24/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph, Dave Washburn, 02/24/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph,
Jonathan Walther, 02/25/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph, Dave Washburn, 02/25/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph, Jonathan Walther, 02/25/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph, Peter Kirk, 02/25/2004
- RE: [b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph, Ken Penner, 02/25/2004
- Message not available
- Re: [b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph, Harold R. Holmyard III, 02/25/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph, Charles David Isbell, 02/25/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph, Jonathan Walther, 02/25/2004
- [b-hebrew] Start with Jacob Neusner's translation of the Mishnah, $30., Christopher V. Kimball, 02/25/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Start with Jacob Neusner's translation of the Mishnah, $30., Maurice A. O'Sullivan, 02/25/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph,
Peter Kirk, 02/24/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph,
Jonathan Walther, 02/23/2004
- [b-hebrew] Messiah in Isaiah, Lisbeth S. Fried, 02/25/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Messiah in Isaiah, furuli, 02/25/2004
- RE: [b-hebrew] Messiah in Isaiah, Lisbeth S. Fried, 02/25/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph,
Peter Kirk, 02/23/2004
- Message not available
- Re: [b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph, Dave Washburn, 02/25/2004
- [b-hebrew] Talmud availability, Ken Penner, 02/25/2004
- [b-hebrew] Talmud availability, Joseph I. Lauer, 02/25/2004
- [b-hebrew] OFF - TOPIC (please, help!), jason, 02/27/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.