b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
Re: [b-hebrew] Route of the Exodus (Red Sea Crossing)
- From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
- To: "Walter R. Mattfeld" <mattfeld12 AT charter.net>
- Cc: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Route of the Exodus (Red Sea Crossing)
- Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 04:10:07 -0800
On 23/01/2004 16:30, Walter R. Mattfeld wrote:
Dear Peter,Maybe that is because of the route they took (which had to be nearly straight), or because they needed to dig 9 metres below sea level. Darius, and perhaps others before him, were able to build a canal from the Bitter Lakes to the Red Sea without the aid of dynamite. Anyway, http://www.nrzam.org.uk/Site%20Resources/UnionCastle_odds/SuezCanalSouth.jpg suggests that Shalluf (Chalouf) is very near where I viewed the canal, and this was not rocky high ground.
Thankyou for your most interesting explantion on the term "wall of water,"
(especially Nahum 3:8) suggesting it need not necessarily be as portrayed in
Cecile B. DeMille's Exodus movie with Charlton Heston as Moses (a stirring
movie !).
As regards the flat alluvial plain of the Isthmus of Suez, if I recall
rightly there is an elevation called Shalluf between the Bitter Lakes and
the Bay Clysma sits on. For the Red Sea (Gulf of Suez) to "naturally flow"
into the Bitter Lakes it would have to overcome this barrier. It proved a
hard nut to crack for the builders of the canal under deLesseps, who used a
lot of dynamite on it to blast his way through to the Red Sea. ...
Kitchen's book should indeed be read - I don't have it, but thanks, Uri, for the recommendation. But Kitchen is not a geologist, and so not perhaps the best to tell us whether there is in fact a rock barrier between the Bitter Lakes and the Red Sea, or only one of sand and silt.
... For the Red
Sea to be high enough in antiquity to reach the Bitter Lakes as suggested by
Professors Kitchen and Hoffmeier, the 18th/19th dynasty Egyptian seaport of
Tell el Merkha on the west shore of the Sinai Peninsula, near the shore,
would have had to have been UNDER WATER, no such evidence exist that it was
ever under water. ...
May I just repeat that I agree with you and everyone that there has been no significant change in the sea level.
--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/
-
[b-hebrew] Route of the Exodus (Red Sea Crossing),
Walter R. Mattfeld, 01/23/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Route of the Exodus (Red Sea Crossing),
Peter Kirk, 01/23/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Route of the Exodus (Red Sea Crossing), Uri Hurwitz, 01/23/2004
-
Message not available
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Route of the Exodus (Red Sea Crossing),
Peter Kirk, 01/24/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Route of the Exodus (Red Sea Crossing),
Dora Smith, 01/24/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Route of the Exodus (Red Sea Crossing), Peter Kirk, 01/24/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Route of the Exodus (Red Sea Crossing),
Dora Smith, 01/24/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Route of the Exodus (Red Sea Crossing),
Peter Kirk, 01/24/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Route of the Exodus (Red Sea Crossing),
Peter Kirk, 01/23/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Route of the Exodus (Red Sea Crossing),
Shoshanna Walker, 01/24/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Route of the Exodus (Red Sea Crossing), Peter Kirk, 01/24/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Route of the Exodus (Red Sea Crossing),
Jonathan D. Safren, 01/25/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Route of the Exodus (Red Sea Crossing), Harold R. Holmyard III, 01/25/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Route of the Exodus (Red Sea Crossing),
Yigal Levin, 01/25/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Route of the Exodus (Red Sea Crossing), Uri Hurwitz, 01/25/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.