b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Peter Kirk" <Peter_Kirk AT sil.org>
- To: "'Biblical Hebrew'" <b-hebrew AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: Ex nihilo? Was Raqiyah
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 20:28:14 +0200
I see creation ex nihilo in verse 1, which I still interpret as an
independent sentence - don't let's get back into discussing the syntax
again. On my interpretation, which is certainly a very ancient one going
back at least to the LXX, there is no mention of preexisting matter,
just that God created the heavens and the earth. This interpretation
takes v.2 as a description of the state of the earth just after it had
been created.
Peter Kirk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Ross [mailto:BillRoss AT norisksoftware.com]
> Sent: 22 July 2002 15:26
> To: Biblical Hebrew
> Subject: RE: Ex nihilo? Was Raqiyah
>
> If this is off topic, then please ignore.
>
> But in light of this discussion I wonder what in Gen 1 gives one *any*
> cause to view this as a description of creation ex-nihilo? Clearly it
is
> "out of water," no?
>
> Bill Ross
> BillRoss AT norisksoftware.com
>
-
RE: Ex nihilo? Was Raqiyah,
Bill Ross, 07/22/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Ex nihilo? Was Raqiyah, Yigal Levin, 07/22/2002
- RE: Ex nihilo? Was Raqiyah, Peter Kirk, 07/22/2002
- Re: Ex nihilo? Was Raqiyah, Ian Hutchesson, 07/22/2002
- Re: Ex nihilo? Was Raqiyah, Ian Hutchesson, 07/22/2002
- RE: Ex nihilo? Was Raqiyah, Peter Kirk, 07/23/2002
- FW: Ex nihilo? Was Raqiyah, Peter Kirk, 07/24/2002
- Re: Ex nihilo? Was Raqiyah, Ian Hutchesson, 07/24/2002
- Re: Ex nihilo? Was Raqiyah, Ian Hutchesson, 07/24/2002
- re: Ex nihilo? Was Raqiyah, Dave Washburn, 07/24/2002
- re: Ex nihilo? Was Raqiyah, Rolf Furuli, 07/25/2002
- re: Ex nihilo? Was Raqiyah, Dave Washburn, 07/25/2002
- FW: Ex nihilo? Was Raqiyah, Richard Burks, 07/25/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.