b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Paul Zellmer" <pzellmer AT sc.rr.com>
- To: "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: bereshit
- Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 14:32:34 -0500
Ian,
In the Ezek 20:5 passage, the last three clauses are not controlled at all
by the first. They are describing how Israel was chosen.
In the Ezek 24:25 passage, you are dealing with a complex definite object of
a single clause. How does that show complex subordination?
Paul Zellmer
Ian wrote:
> Whoops. Too much in a hurry. Try, with the same aim,
> ie to show the government of complex subordination:
>
> Eze 20:5
> bywm bxry by$r'l
> w'$' ydy lzr` byt y`qb
> w'wd` lhm b'rc mcrym
> w'$' ydy lhm l'mr 'ny yhwh 'lhykm
>
> Eze 24:25
> bywm qxty mhm 't-m`wzm m$w$ tp'rtm
> 't mxmd `ynyhm
> w't-m$h np$m bnyhm wbnwtyhm
>
-
Re: bereshit
, (continued)
- Re: bereshit, Ian Hutchesson, 03/15/2002
- Re: bereshit, Ian Hutchesson, 03/15/2002
- RE: bereshit, Peter Kirk, 03/15/2002
- RE: bereshit, Peter Kirk, 03/15/2002
- Re: bereshit, Christian M. M. Brady, 03/15/2002
- Re: bereshit, Ian Hutchesson, 03/16/2002
- Re: bereshit, Charles David Isbell, 03/16/2002
- RE: bereshit, Peter Kirk, 03/16/2002
- Re: bereshit, Ian Hutchesson, 03/17/2002
- RE: bereshit, Lisbeth S. Fried, 03/17/2002
- RE: bereshit, Paul Zellmer, 03/17/2002
- RE: bereshit, Paul Zellmer, 03/17/2002
- RE: bereshit, Peter Kirk, 03/17/2002
- RE: bereshit, Peter Kirk, 03/17/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.