b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Peter Kirk"<peter_kirk AT sil.org>
- To: <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re[4]: End of Malachi: Kherem.
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 14:40:46 -0500
I can see a lot of fascinating ideas to explore around this theme,
though some go rather far from b-hebrew. Yes, clearly in Deu 7:25 as
in the Achan incident XEREM is something to be avoided, even something
unclean and detestable, if used in any way other than what YHWH has
decided. So the idea is here more similar to the Arabic one. I wonder
if the idea here is that the item or land is really YHWH's but has
been misused for idolatrous purposes; of course YHWH can only accept
back his own if it is first purged utterly of evil e.g. by being
burned or completely devastated. There may be a link to the
destruction of the earth by fire in Isaiah 24 and to the fallow period
for the land to "enjoy its sabbaths" in Leviticus 26. And I wonder if
later commentators, whether Jewish or Christian, have semi-consciously
interpreted the end of Malachi in the light of the destruction of
Jerusalem in 70 CE or perhaps in other periods. As a result I am not
very happy with the translation "curse" in Malachi, perhaps better
would be something like "devastation".
Peter Kirk
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re[3]: End of Malachi: Kherem.
Author: <lewreich AT javanet.com> at Internet
Date: 21/02/2000 21:45
On 21 Feb 00, at 22:26, Peter Kirk wrote:
> This may be true, but I am concerned about your first example. The
> English "harem" is derived via Turkish from the Arabic "haram", which
> is also a Muslim religious concept. A colleague of mine recently did a
> comparative study of the Hebrew XEREM and the word "haram" as borrowed
> from Arabic into another language under Muslim influence. My colleague
> found some quite significant differences between the concepts, e.g.
> that the Arabic "haram" is to be rejected because it is unclean,
> whereas the Hebrew XEREM is to be destroyed because it is holy. So
> pork is "haram" (forbidden by religious laws) to the Muslim, but I
> don't think XEREM would ever be used of anything like pork in the
> Hebrew Bible.
I agree, but what do you think of Deut. 7:25, where it's talking about
something more odious than forbidden food, viz., idols, herem is
used? The idols aren't to be regarded as holy, in fact the word
to'evah is used.
Lewis Reich
---
You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: Peter_Kirk AT sil.org
To unsubscribe, forward this message to
leave-b-hebrew-14207U AT franklin.oit.unc.e
du
To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.
-
End of Malachi: Kherem.,
Lewis Reich, 02/21/2000
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: End of Malachi: Kherem., Bill Ross, 02/21/2000
- RE: End of Malachi: Kherem., Liz Fried, 02/21/2000
- Re: End of Malachi: Kherem., Lewis Reich, 02/21/2000
- Re[2]: End of Malachi: Kherem., Peter Kirk, 02/21/2000
- RE: End of Malachi: Kherem., Lewis Reich, 02/21/2000
- Re: Re[2]: End of Malachi: Kherem., Lewis Reich, 02/21/2000
- RE: End of Malachi: Kherem., Liz Fried, 02/21/2000
- Re[4]: End of Malachi: Kherem., Peter Kirk, 02/23/2000
- Re: End of Malachi: Kherem., Jason Hare, 02/24/2000
- Re: End of Malachi: Kherem., George Athas, 02/24/2000
- Re: End of Malachi: Kherem., Ben Crick, 02/24/2000
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.