b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Niels Peter Lemche <npl AT teol.ku.dk>
- To: "'b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu'" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: SV: Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion)
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 07:36:58 +0100
Instead of continuing this theme, I would suggest that people obtains some
information about all of this from, e.g. John Collins' excellent survey of
Daniel in the Anchor Bible Dictionary. In light of the many historical
problems pointed out there, a defensorate of Daniel belonging to the 6th
century is in need of so many 'what if's' that it is hard to see how it can
survive.
NPL
> ----------
> Fra: Silver Eiger[SMTP:silver.eiger AT mail.ee]
> Svar til: Silver Eiger
> Sendt: 20. februar 2000 19:46
> Til: Biblical Hebrew
> Emne: Re: Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion)
>
> Instead of continuing this theme, I would suggest that people obtains some
> information about all of this from, e.g. John Collins' excellent survey of
> Daniel in the Anchor Bible Dictionary. In light of the many historical
> problems pointed out there, a defensorate of Daniel belonging to the 6th
> century is in need of so many 'what if's' that it is hard to see how it
> can survive.
>
> NPL
>
>
-
Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion),
Rolf Furuli, 02/15/2000
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion), Peter Kirk, 02/16/2000
- Re: Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion), Rolf Furuli, 02/19/2000
- Re: Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion), Ian Hutchesson, 02/19/2000
- Re: Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion), Rolf Furuli, 02/19/2000
- RE: Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion), Niels Peter Lemche, 02/19/2000
- Re: Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion), Ian Hutchesson, 02/20/2000
- Re: Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion), Rolf Furuli, 02/20/2000
- Re: Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion), Silver Eiger, 02/20/2000
- Re: Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion), Ian Hutchesson, 02/20/2000
- SV: Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion), Niels Peter Lemche, 02/21/2000
- Re: Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion), Rolf Furuli, 02/21/2000
- Re[2]: Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion), Peter Kirk, 02/21/2000
- Re[2]: Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion), Peter Kirk, 02/21/2000
- Re[2]: Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion), Ian Hutchesson, 02/21/2000
- Re[3]: Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion), Peter Kirk, 02/22/2000
- Re[3]: Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion), Ian Hutchesson, 02/22/2000
- Re: Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion), Ian Hutchesson, 02/22/2000
- Re: Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion), Silver Eiger, 02/23/2000
- RE: Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion), Niels Peter Lemche, 02/23/2000
- Re[4]: Diachronic study (was Purpose for discussion), Peter Kirk, 02/24/2000
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.