b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Niels Peter Lemche <npl AT teol.ku.dk>
- To: 'Paul Zellmer' <zellmer AT digitelone.com>
- Cc: "'b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu'" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: Purpose for discussion
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 08:41:51 +0100
Just one question for a strater. Why are we the persons you address and not
the person who have been so outspoken in favour of a rearrangement of
chronology--biblical and ANE--with such important consequences, yet almost
without the slightest hint of evidence in support? And what about Hebrew?
Several of the contributors have mentioned that they do not read Hebrew. And
if it is a Biblical Hebrew list exclusively, why an open list and not a list
limited to the professionals in this business, i.e. the Hebrew Bible?
I have nothing against discussing Hebrew as a language in a professional
way. I do it every day at the university. But if you overlook the postings
from the last few months, you will see that it is really the historical
questions that interest people. And I think that I am excused for not
leaving the battle ground to evangelical people who know the truth--or so it
seems. So maybe you should back to your mail and readdress it to the right
people.
NPL
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Zellmer [SMTP:zellmer AT digitelone.com]
> Sent: Monday, 14 February, 2000 00:46
> To: Biblical Hebrew
> Subject: Purpose for discussion
>
> Ian (and NPL, et al.),
>
> There is something else that I would like to understand. What exactly
> are we hoping to accomplish with this extended discussion on
> historiology? Are you looking for a scholarly discussion of the timing
> of events if they occurred as presented in the Hebrew scriptures? If
> so, I'm afraid that you are in the wrong forum.
>
> To expand on (and reverse) NPL's previous analogy, you are talking to
> "auto mechanics," for I am convinced that most of us joined this list
> because we wanted further insight into the language of the Hebrew bible.
> We neither have the background nor the inclination to do in-depth
> historical studies unless they can teach us something about the text as
> we have it. Oh, we do have some understanding about the historical
> questions, but so far you have not demonstrated the smallest
> significance on the language that is caused by holding that the events
> of the Pentateuch actually occurred as written, never occurred, or
> occurred in some "kernel of truth" form.
>
> So please, if you will, inform us as to why you see this as a critical
> study for this forum. If it is to find a scholarly discussion, I
> believe those scholars live en masse on lists like ANE, but,
> regretably(?), not here.
>
> Paul
>
> ----
>
> Paul and Dee Zellmer, Jimmy Guingab, Geoffrey Beltran
> Ibanag Translation Project
> Cabagan, Isabela, Rep. of Philippines
>
> zellmer AT digitelone.com
>
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: npl AT teol.ku.dk
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to
> $subst('Email.Unsub')
> To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.
-
Purpose for discussion,
Paul Zellmer, 02/13/2000
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
RE: Purpose for discussion,
Niels Peter Lemche, 02/14/2000
- Re: Purpose for discussion, Paul Zellmer, 02/14/2000
- RE: Purpose for discussion, Jonathan D. Safren, 02/14/2000
- RE: Purpose for discussion, Dave Washburn, 02/14/2000
- Re: RE: Purpose for discussion, Ian Charles Hutchesson, 02/14/2000
- Re: Purpose for discussion, Peter Kirk, 02/14/2000
- RE: Purpose for discussion, Niels Peter Lemche, 02/14/2000
- Re: Purpose for discussion, Paul Zellmer, 02/14/2000
- Re: Purpose for discussion, Paul Zellmer, 02/14/2000
- RE: Purpose for discussion, Niels Peter Lemche, 02/15/2000
- Re: Purpose for discussion, Paul Zellmer, 02/15/2000
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.