b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: peter_kirk AT sil.org
- To: <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re[2]: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?
- Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 17:40:57 -0500
Ian asked:
Would you doubt that Jacob was dead in Gen 50:15 (which uses
quite similar wording and progression of verb forms)? What about
Nabal's death in 1Sam25:39?
The difference in both of these cases is that the narrative has
already stated that the person in question has died (Gen 49:33, 1 Sam
25:38). This is not actually stated in 1 Samuel 31:4-5 - especially
if M"T may be a participle not a QATAL form, as Dave has pointed out.
It is clear that both Saul and the armour-bearer died, but not clear,
I think, that Saul died before the armour-bearer fell on his sword.
Peter Kirk
-
1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?,
peter_kirk, 12/30/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, Ian Hutchesson, 12/30/1999
- Re: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, Dave Washburn, 12/31/1999
- RE: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, Niels Peter Lemche, 12/31/1999
- Re[2]: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, peter_kirk, 12/31/1999
- RE: Re[2]: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, Niels Peter Lemche, 12/31/1999
- RE: Re[2]: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, Dave Washburn, 12/31/1999
- RE: Re[2]: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, Ian Hutchesson, 12/31/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.