b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Dave Washburn" <dwashbur AT nyx.net>
- To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: Re: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?
- Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 22:14:02 -0700
Peter wrote:
>
> Well, here's an interesting question. Does the phrase in 1 Sam 31:5:
>
> WAY.AR:) ... KIY M"T $F)UWL
>
> necessarily mean that Saul was actually dead, or can it mean simply
> that he appeared to the armour bearer to be dead?
>
> This is actually a question of Hebrew!
And a good one! I'm wondering why we have to consider M"T a
perfect and not a participle? If it's the latter then we read "[he] saw
that Saul was dying."
Dave Washburn
http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur
Teach me your way, O Lord, and I will walk in your truth;
give me an undivided heart that I may fear your name.
Psalm 86:11
-
1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?,
peter_kirk, 12/30/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, Ian Hutchesson, 12/30/1999
- Re: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, Dave Washburn, 12/31/1999
- RE: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, Niels Peter Lemche, 12/31/1999
- Re[2]: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, peter_kirk, 12/31/1999
- RE: Re[2]: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, Niels Peter Lemche, 12/31/1999
- RE: Re[2]: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, Dave Washburn, 12/31/1999
- RE: Re[2]: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?, Ian Hutchesson, 12/31/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.