b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: peter_kirk AT sil.org
- To: <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: SV: Re[12]: JEPD Evidence
- Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 18:08:36 -0500
Who defines the rules of the game? Who authorises changes in them? And
who is the referee? Also it seems the rules are different in different
places and traditions. When you say somebody is "not a scholar", is
that equivalent to the soccer player calling the American football
player "not a football player"?
Peter Kirk
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: SV: Re[12]: JEPD Evidence
Author: <npl AT teol.ku.dk> at Internet
Date: 20/12/1999 11:53
Won't help Jonathan.
Also the Bbaylonian scribes were scholars, however, not of the modern kind.
Neither was Luther. Again, it has to do playing by the rules. The rules will
be changing, yes, and at a time you will have to conclude that according to
modern standards I will no longer be considered a scholar .. Luther is
accoridng to modern standards not a contemporary scholar, rather the subject
of scholarship. I think I play according to present rules for the game. If
you follows the rules of yesterday, you are not part of the game. That may
change according to circumstances, but that is as it is today.
NPL
> ----------
> Fra: Jonathan Bailey[SMTP:jonathan.bailey AT gmx.de]
> Svar til: Jonathan Bailey
> Sendt: 20. december 1999 11:54
> Til: Biblical Hebrew
> Emne: Re[12]: JEPD Evidence
>
> Thanks for your support Jim. I see acknowledgement from you, a rather
> stalwart
> liberal (if my assessment is correct) that these men, who were all willing
> to give place
> to the supernatural, were indeed scholars, as something of a vindication
> from
> Lemche's assertions.
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan Bailey
> Hochschule fr Jdische Studien
> Heidelberg
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------
>
> >At 01:04 AM 12/20/99 +0100, you wrote:
> >>I will take my place among my brothers Thomas Aquinas, Jerome, Luther,
> and
> >Origen
> >>in the Fraternity of the Non-Scholars.
>
> >all in fact extraordinarily trained in their respective fields. Luther,
> as
> >you know, had an earned doctorate from Wittenberg. Aquinas as well was a
> >result of University training. Jerome spent years learning from the
> rabbis.
> >Origen was a brilliant scholar. All trained. None dilettantes.
>
> >Best
>
> >Jim
> >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> >Jim West, ThD
> >jwest AT highland.net
> >http://web.infoave.net/~jwest
>
> >"This is the sort of nonsense up with which I will not put." Winston
> Churchill
>
>
> >---
> >You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: jonathan.bailey AT gmx.de
> >To unsubscribe, forward this message to
> leave-b-hebrew-14207U AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
> >To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: npl AT teol.ku.dk
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to
> leave-b-hebrew-14207U AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
> To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.
>
---
You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: [Peter_Kirk AT sil.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to
leave-b-hebrew-14207U AT franklin.oit.unc.e
du
To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.
-
Re: Re[10]: JEPD Evidence
, (continued)
- Re: Re[10]: JEPD Evidence, Jim West, 12/19/1999
- Re: JEPD Evidence, Matthew Anstey, 12/20/1999
- Re[8]: JEPD Evidence, peter_kirk, 12/20/1999
- Re[12]: JEPD Evidence, Jonathan Bailey, 12/20/1999
- SV: Re[12]: JEPD Evidence, Niels Peter Lemche, 12/20/1999
- Re: JEPD Evidence, Jonathan D. Safren, 12/20/1999
- Re[7]: JEPD Evidence, peter_kirk, 12/20/1999
- Re: Re[8]: JEPD Evidence, Polycarp66, 12/20/1999
- Re: SV: Re[12]: JEPD Evidence, Jonathan Bailey, 12/20/1999
- Re: JEPD Evidence, Ray Clendenen, 12/20/1999
- Re: SV: Re[12]: JEPD Evidence, peter_kirk, 12/20/1999
- RE: SV: Re[12]: JEPD Evidence, Niels Peter Lemche, 12/20/1999
- RE: SV: Re[12]: JEPD Evidence, Dave Washburn, 12/20/1999
- Re: JEPD Evidence, Jonathan D. Safren, 12/20/1999
-
Re: JEPD Evidence,
Ray Clendenen, 12/20/1999
- Re: JEPD Evidence, Jonathan D. Safren, 12/21/1999
- Re: JEPD Evidence, Ian Hutchesson, 12/20/1999
- Re[2]: SV: Re[12]: JEPD Evidence, peter_kirk, 12/21/1999
- Re[10]: JEPD Evidence, peter_kirk, 12/21/1999
- Re: JEPD Evidence, Stephen C. Carlson, 12/21/1999
- Re: JEPD Evidence, Ray Clendenen, 12/21/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.