b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Jonathan Bailey <jonathan.bailey AT gmx.de>
- To: Biblical Hebrew list <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re[6]: JEPD Evidence
- Date: Sun, 19 Dec 1999 12:52:40 +0100
---------- Original Message ----------
> [Niels Peter Lemche] In 1998, an Iman gave a lecture to me and my
>students in Damascus. One of his points was interesting. A commity of
>liberal Muslim theologians had worked for years on the text of the Qur'an in
>order to see whether it was the work of man or of God. Great surprise, they
>had to conclude that such a text could not have been written by any man, so
>it must be God who was the author. I repeat my earlier remark that this idea
>about inspiration belongs in a different context.
I will make up a story about a group of humanistic bible theologians who set
about to
discover whether Torah was from men or from God. Great suprise, they had to
conclude that such a text could not have come from God, so it must have been a
mish mash of pagan myths.
I don't know what you are trying to get at with your Muslim story, but I will
say that I
wrote my post to Kirk late last night, and my mentioning of the possibility
that the
divine origin of Torah affecting our analysis of it was really not to clever
an argument in
that context, and I will indeed keep such statements to a minimum. I do
challenge you
however, to see your desire to exclude any religious argument from our
discussions
as really a plea for the universal adoption of the religion of secular
humanism in the
list, and to remember, that though this list is a non religious list, it was
originally
started by Christians, and then joined by Jews and members of other
religions, and
their views should also be welcome here. Now I am certainly not advocating
sermons
out of the OT, but since it seems that the history of the Hebrew text is
on-topic for
this list, one should be prepared for a variety of views concerning the
generation of the
book, particularly since the book claims to be the written revelation of God
on earth. If
you can't tolerate people who are willing to treat the book like the word of
God, then
do not study the bible.
I am not asking you to reply to my posts or share threads with me. I am just
asking
you not to get so upset by the fact that there are people on the list who are
not
coming from the same place you are. I will certainly not be upset if you wish
to
discuss the process by which primitive hunter-gatherers invented Yah. The
list is
open to all.
Jonathan Bailey
Hochschule für Jüdische Studien
Heidelberg
-
RE: Re[2]: JEPD Evidence
, (continued)
- RE: Re[2]: JEPD Evidence, Niels Peter Lemche, 12/18/1999
- JEPD evidence, Ruthy & Baruch, 12/18/1999
- Re: Re[2]: JEPD Evidence, Ruthy & Baruch, 12/18/1999
- Re: JEPD Evidence, Jonathan D. Safren, 12/18/1999
- Re[2]: JEPD Evidence, peter_kirk, 12/18/1999
- Re[3]: JEPD Evidence, peter_kirk, 12/18/1999
- Re[4]: JEPD Evidence, Jonathan Bailey, 12/18/1999
- RE: Re[4]: JEPD Evidence, Niels Peter Lemche, 12/18/1999
- Re: Re[2]: JEPD Evidence, Moshe Shulman, 12/18/1999
- Re[4]: JEPD Evidence, Jonathan Bailey, 12/19/1999
- Re[6]: JEPD Evidence, Jonathan Bailey, 12/19/1999
- RE: Re[6]: JEPD Evidence, Niels Peter Lemche, 12/19/1999
- Re[5]: JEPD Evidence, peter_kirk, 12/19/1999
- Re[6]: JEPD Evidence, Jonathan Bailey, 12/19/1999
- Re[6]: JEPD Evidence, Jonathan Bailey, 12/19/1999
- Re[6]: JEPD Evidence, Jonathan Bailey, 12/19/1999
- Re: Re[6]: JEPD Evidence, Ruthy & Baruch, 12/19/1999
- RE: Re[6]: JEPD Evidence, Niels Peter Lemche, 12/19/1999
- Re[10]: JEPD Evidence, Jonathan Bailey, 12/19/1999
- Re: Re[10]: JEPD Evidence, Jim West, 12/19/1999
- Re: JEPD Evidence, Matthew Anstey, 12/20/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.