b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Ian Hutchesson <mc2499 AT mclink.it>
- To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Re[2]: Historical David (Tel-Dan) (Peter)
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 01:07:35 +0100
Dear Peter,
It's a shame you feel the necessity to ridicule the work of a respected
world-class scholar in the field of Semitic studies. I would have thought
that there was a lot to learn from one's teachers. It is the student who
doesn't take note of what such a teacher says that usually fails miserably.
You may not agree with what he says, but have you really got the facilities
to criticise Garbini's work?
If you read Italian I could suggest several score of articles to see the
man's work so that you would have a sounder basis on which to make
comments. (The reason I had to translate this particular article was that
too few scholars read Italian and I was asked to translate it.)
Ian
At 20.08 27/01/99 -0500, Peter_Kirk AT SIL.ORG wrote:
>
>How predictable! Someone doesn't like the conclusions that would
>follow from certain evidence and so finds some excuse for declaring
>that evidence a forgery. Even Ian believes this professor enough to
>translate his article and put it on his web site; but at least he
>reminds us of George's web site also.
>
>Let's assume for now that the Tel-Dan inscriptions are a forgery. What
>a careless forger! He made the inscription far too readable, a dead
>giveaway. Yet he seems to have been quite a scholar. Not only has he
>used believable letter shapes, close to those in various inscriptions
>of the correct period. He has also invented his own aberrant dialect
>of Aramaic (when it would have been so much easier to follow a
>standard model), which of course cannot be anything like the actual
>speech of the Arameans who conquered this area, although we have no
>data to say what this speech was really like. Yet also what a
>restrained forger! How he must have agonised about including only half
>the name of king ending in -yahu, rather than a whole name of a
>Biblical king, and to leave out the word break in BYTDWD, just in case
>someone might think a slightly less spoiled forgery too obvious!
>
>:-^)
>
>Peter Kirk
>
>
>______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
>Subject: Re: Historical David (Tel-Dan)
>Author: mc2499 AT mclink.it at internet
>Date: 26/01/1999 23:29
>
>
>If anyone is interested in an analysis of the Tel-Dan inscription written
>by Giovanni Garbini, Professor of Semitic Studies at the University of Rome
>"La Sapienza", I have a version translated at
>
> http://www.geocities.com/Paris/LeftBank/5210/tel_dan.htm
>
>And while we are here, George Athas maintains the Tel Dan Inscription
>Website at:
>
> http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gathas/teldan.htm
>
>
>Ian
><snip>
>
>---
>You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: mc2499 AT mclink.it
>To unsubscribe, forward this message to
$subst('Email.Unsub')
>To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.
>
>
>
-
Re: Re[2]: Historical David (Tel-Dan) (Peter),
Ian Hutchesson, 01/27/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re[4]: Historical David (Tel-Dan) (Peter), Peter_Kirk, 01/28/1999
- Re: Historical David (Tel-Dan) (Peter), George Athas, 01/28/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.