Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

aifia-education - Re: [Aifia-education] Education is not about content

aifia-education AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of IA education

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: James Spahr <james AT spahr.org>
  • To: aifia-education AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Aifia-education] Education is not about content
  • Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:35:19 -0500


On Nov 11, 2003, at 9:41 AM, Daniel Stouffer wrote:

Of course, I not being a teacher do not fully understand how to put in place the checks and balances necessary in a classroom. As far as self-directed learning goes, I found exploring and train-of-thought navigation very fulfilling.

I do not have a degree in education, but I am paid to have close to 50 twenty-somethings calling me by my last name on a weekly basis.

The best book I have found on the subject of teaching on a college level is 'McKeachie's Teaching Tips' (I know -- it's a dorky name). It was recommended by Edward Tufte, and the chapters I have read have been outstanding.

Chapters 13 through 17 about methods of learning (buzzword: active learning) and how to teach so students learn by these different methods. But I think the real pay dirt in this book that we are looking for is in Chapters 23 & 24, which are entitled 'Teaching Students How to Learn' and 'Teaching Thinking'

Can you tell I have not read them yet? -- If people care, I'll try to summarize them here after I have a chance to digest them.

::

The thoughts I have to contribute now have to do with my experience as a student, and only mildly as an educator. I went through a typical visual design program as an undergraduate. Designers like to boast that they went to school to learn how to think and solve problems -- and at it's best this is what a design education is all about. (Unfortunately most students miss opportunities to get this kind of education -- but that is a lengthy and passionate tangent that I won't go into).

The teaching process is about giving students problems that they are required to solve. In the process of solving these problems, they learn; and the skill of the educator is to assign problems that will cause the students to learn what you want them to learn. Reflection and self evaluation happens in the classroom when we has class discussions (ie. critiques) about the solutions that the students conceived.

Paul Rand once wrote a wonderful essay on the whole process (which I wish I could find right now) when he was teaching at Yale.

The biggest problem I find with teaching IA in this model is the amount of time it takes to absorb and consider a student's solution is substantial -- and this makes group critiques difficult because we rarely focus on the stuff that needs to be focused on.

Regardless -- this method is how I was taught to solve problems and to think creatively. Is it the best way? I have no idea. Did it work for me? I like to think so.

James.








Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page