Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

xom-interest - Re: [XOM-interest] hasChildren vs. getChildCount == 0

xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Janek Bogucki <janekdb AT yahoo.co.uk>
  • To: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] hasChildren vs. getChildCount == 0
  • Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 14:12:51 +0000 (GMT)

--- Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu> wrote:
> I sort of like hasChildren(), but when I marked it package protected
> in the code, hardly anything broke except a few unit tests that were
> testing hasChildren(). None of the samples broke, which is telling.
> Therefore I'm leaning toward removing it. If anyone wants to argue in
> favor of keeping hasChildren(), speak up now. In fact, if you have an
> opinion either way, let me know. Whose in favor of hasChildren, and
> who thinks it should go? The question on the table is whether we
> should delete hasChildren. Vote now.
>

+1 to remove hasChildren().

-Janek





___________________________________________________________
BT Yahoo! Broadband - Free modem offer, sign up online today and save £80
http://btyahoo.yahoo.co.uk




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page