Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Flavien Bridault <vlaaad AT sourcemage.org>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps
  • Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 18:48:36 +0200

Le lundi 05 juin 2006 à 12:22 -0500, Jeremy Blosser a écrit :
> On Jun 05, Flavien Bridault [vlaaad AT sourcemage.org] wrote:
> > Le lundi 05 juin 2006 ? 11:51 -0500, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) a ?crit :
> > > On Jun 05, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) [jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org] wrote:
> > > > The only real candidate standing right now is git
> > >
> > > I guess not all the data has probably made it back here. For all the
> > > other
> > > SCMs we've tried, basic performance and interface has proved a major
> > > issue.
> > > Arwed can speak more to these since he's the one doing most of the
> > > head-to-head testing, but while SVK is a good bit faster than SVN it's
> > > still quite slow and unwieldy.
> >
> > So it is still useful that I continue to test SVK for the disk section ?
>
> I'd say keep working as you are til you hear otherwise, unless you find you
> really hate what you're doing now for some reason. In that case you could
> move back to p4 or on to git but you'd need to bring your latest changes
> across of course.

Ok, I can continue to work with svk, but I was wondering if it would not
be simpler for you to have disk and video (from Arwed) sections back in
p4 before doing the whole import in git. But if you rather like to wait
to do that in the same time, that's not a problem.
--
Flavien Bridault

Disk, Graphics, Graphics-libs sections Guru
Source Mage GNU/Linux - http://www.sourcemage.org

irc: vlaaad
jabber: vlaaad AT amessage.be

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page