Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

msar-riders - Re: [MSAR] field communications

msar-riders@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Mounted search and rescue

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Mike" <revmp777@earthlink.net>
  • To: "Mounted search and rescue" <msar-riders@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [MSAR] field communications
  • Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:14:48 -0400

Hi Marie,

LE stands for law enforcement, either police, sheriff, or other. I'm
glad you are insured by your LE. We're still looking for a company that
will cover us. I've contacted some and of the very few who are willing to
write a policy, the prices were too high for us to afford coverage. I don't
even have liability for my dogs because Citizen's Insurance ( a state run
last alternative for homeowners) won't cover them. And the LE agencies
would not even consider covering us. Nor would they allow us to use their
radios. Enjoy your blessings.

Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marie Lester" <marie.lester@gmail.com>
To: "Mounted search and rescue" <msar-riders@lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 10:34
Subject: Re: [MSAR] field communications


> Mike,
> I am not certain what the anacronym LE means....could you enlighten me?
> We are a completely volunteer unit, but work under the auspices of the
> Emerrgency Manaagement Agency and the Licking Co. Sheriff's Dept.
> We are insured through the EMA for any activities related to their
> efforts, and we use the radios supplied by the Sheriff's Dept.
> Marie Lester
> Central Ohio Mounted Search Unit
>
> On 5/17/06, Mike <revmp777@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > Una,
> >
> > Are the SAR teams in your area private groups or are they under an
LE of
> > some type? Most of the teams here are private, not-for-profit groups
that
> > aren't under an LE umbrella. We don't get much cooperation from them
> > usually, and almost never have access to their resources. I envy teams
with
> > some "official" support.
> >
> > Mike Pici
> > Team Commander
> > Florida SAR Specialists, Inc.
> > www.floridasarspecialists.org
> > 727-798-9227
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Una Smith" <una.smith@att.net>
> > To: "Mounted search and rescue" <msar-riders@lists.ibiblio.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 08:51
> > Subject: Re: [MSAR] field communications
> >
> >
> > > I agree with Irv that for SAR public safety frequencies are the better
> > > option, usually. Most SAR teams in New Mexico have their own licensed
> > > frequency, which all members of the team can use without an individual
> > > license. That is a big plus. The minus, a relatively small one, is
> > > that the frequency can be used only for public safety purposes, not
for
> > > members' personal uses; this can limit to mock searches, other
training,
> > > and event support the amount of practice that a member in training
gets
> > > in using the radio effectively.
> > >
> > > For my event last weekend, I chose to go with ham not public service
so
> > > that we could use two ham repeaters with excellent coverage (mostly
line
> > > of sight) in the event area. The two farthest stations were about 20
> > > miles from each other, one down in a canyon, the other up on and
almost
> > > behind a mountain. Most of the hams involved were also SAR
responders,
> > > which was an added bonus in the event of an emergency.
> > >
> > > Una Smith
> > > New Mexico
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > MSAR-Riders mailing list
> > > MSAR-Riders@lists.ibiblio.org
> > > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/msar-riders
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > MSAR-Riders mailing list
> > MSAR-Riders@lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/msar-riders
> >
> _______________________________________________
> MSAR-Riders mailing list
> MSAR-Riders@lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/msar-riders
>






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page