Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] BH verbal system

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Rolf Furuli <furuli AT online.no>
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] BH verbal system
  • Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:21:50 +0100

Dear James,

If you read my dissertation, you may perhaps change your mind regarding the results of applying my model to different languages. Regarding English and Hebrew aspects, my conclusion is that Hebrew and English aspects have three similarities and three differences, and because the most important side is different, these aspects are very different. BTW, in my system English simple past is not an aspect but a tense; the perfective aspect in English is the perfect participle.

If you apply my model to Classical Greek, the conclusion is that aorist represents only the perfective aspect and not past tense, while imperfect is a combination of the imperfective aspect and past tense.

The characteristics of a language that lacks tense, is that all its finite verb forms in normal clauses (not hypothetical clauses) can be used for past, present, and future. This is true in Classical Hebrew, but not in Classical Greek, English, and Norwegian.


Best regards,

Rolf Furuli
University of Oslo




While I agree that Rolf's analysis of the verb forms has great value and has
inspired many people to start asking the right questions the main problem I
have with Rolf's method of analysis is this:

If we were to employ the method used by Rolf to analyse verb forms I'm sure
that we would get pretty much the same results for every human language.
That is to say that we would conclude from the data that tense is not
grammaticalised in any verb forms of any language.

e.g.

Yesterday I went to the shop (unambiguous past, perfective aspect)
Sally went to the shop every day of her life (unambgiuous past, imperfective
aspect (repeated action)
As I went to the shop I saw a big fat bird eating rice (unambiguous past,
imperfective aspect (continuous action interrupted by a perfective action))
If I went to the shop I'd buy it for you (hypothetical future)

Conclusion. Past tense is not grammaticalised in the English 'simple past'.

And so this calls into question the value of Rolf's analysis for real world
tasks like translation. We could analyse the verb form 'went' for
uncancellable semantic meaning and get surprising results but for real world
tasks like translating the verb form 'went' into, say, Italian this
knowledge of itself would be of little use. The sentences above clearly show
several different uses of the verb form and to translate them properly it is
the usage of the verb which will likely dominate its translation.

James Christian

2010/1/31 K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>

Stoney:

On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 4:46 PM, s.a.breyer <s.a.breyer AT gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Rolf:
>
> My faith in the admirable clarity and rigor of your analysis is
> profoundly shaken by this:
>
> > It is a fundamental linguistic truth that verbs used in narratives
> have past reference.
>
> On what basis do you make this assertion? It seems to me neither
> self-evident nor borne out by linguistic fact, teste folktale and joke
> on the one hand, and the practice of many eminent writers of fiction on
> the other.
>
> Stoney Breyer
> Writer / Touchwood Creative
>
> In Biblical Hebrew, where almost all the narratives are history, i.e.
past.
I don't think he means modern authors, nor folklore.

Karl W. Randolph.
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew

_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page