xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java

List archive

Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs

From: Richard Tobin <richard AT inf.ed.ac.uk>
To: Elliotte Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
Cc: 'xom-interest' <xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org>, 'Wolfgang Hoschek' <whoschek AT lbl.gov>, public-xml-id AT w3.org
Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 23:40:21 +0000 (GMT)

> Even so the test suite suggests the ID should be registered.

I'm not sure what you mean by "registered". If you mean recognised as
an ID and normalised as one, then yes. This is (by design) the same
as for an ID attribute declared in a DTD: validity does not affect
normalisation or type assignment.

-- Richard

[XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Elliotte Harold, 03/20/2006
- Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Michael Kay, 03/20/2006
- Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Daniel Veillard, 03/20/2006
- Message not available
  - Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Daniel Veillard, 03/20/2006
    - Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Elliotte Harold, 03/20/2006
      - Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Daniel Veillard, 03/20/2006
      - Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Richard Tobin, 03/21/2006
        
        Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Daniel Veillard, 03/21/2006
        
        Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Ed Davies, 03/22/2006
        
        Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Tatu Saloranta, 03/22/2006
        
        Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Richard Tobin, 03/22/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Elliotte Harold, 03/20/2006
  - Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, John Cowan, 03/20/2006
    - Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Adam Constabaris, 03/20/2006
- Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Richard Tobin, 03/22/2006