Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

xom-interest - Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs

xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard AT redhat.com>
  • To: Richard Tobin <richard AT inf.ed.ac.uk>
  • Cc: Elliotte Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>, 'xom-interest' <xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org>, 'Wolfgang Hoschek' <whoschek AT lbl.gov>, public-xml-id AT w3.org
  • Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs
  • Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 18:48:40 -0500

On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 11:40:21PM +0000, Richard Tobin wrote:
>
> > Even so the test suite suggests the ID should be registered.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by "registered". If you mean recognised as
> an ID and normalised as one, then yes. This is (by design) the same
> as for an ID attribute declared in a DTD: validity does not affect
> normalisation or type assignment.

And that's how we end up with software expecting id('1234') or
id('foo bar') to work in XPath. I still think it's a disaster to
let this go though while we had the opportunity to block it and
force the cleanup for xml:id

Daniel

--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat http://redhat.com/
veillard AT redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page