xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java

List archive

Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs

From: Daniel Veillard <veillard AT redhat.com>
To: Elliotte Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
Cc: 'xom-interest' <xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org>, 'Wolfgang Hoschek' <whoschek AT lbl.gov>, public-xml-id AT w3.org
Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:25:17 -0500

On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 11:19:04AM -0500, Elliotte Harold wrote:
> Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 03:59:49PM -0000, Michael Kay wrote:
> >>So: it's clear as mud. The processor must "assure that" (assure whom?) the
> >>value is an NCName, and it mustn't fail if it isn't.
> >
> > There is no fatal error in xml:id, a fatal error would mean stopping
> >any processing of the XML resource. Failure can only result in reporting
> >the error and not registering the ID.
> >
>
> Even so the test suite suggests the ID should be registered. That still
> feels like a mistake.

yeah, sure, I agree with that.

Daniel

--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat http://redhat.com/
veillard AT redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

[XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Elliotte Harold, 03/20/2006
- Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Michael Kay, 03/20/2006
- Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Daniel Veillard, 03/20/2006
- Message not available
  - Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Daniel Veillard, 03/20/2006
    - Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Elliotte Harold, 03/20/2006
      - Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Daniel Veillard, 03/20/2006
      - Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Richard Tobin, 03/21/2006
        
        Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Daniel Veillard, 03/21/2006
        
        Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Ed Davies, 03/22/2006
        
        Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Tatu Saloranta, 03/22/2006
        
        Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Richard Tobin, 03/22/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Elliotte Harold, 03/20/2006
  - Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, John Cowan, 03/20/2006
    - Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Adam Constabaris, 03/20/2006
- Re: [XOM-interest] Non NCName IDs, Richard Tobin, 03/22/2006