Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

xom-interest - Re: [XOM-interest] Performance of Java XPath engines

xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
  • To: shirasu hiroyuki <hirsh AT s9.dion.ne.jp>
  • Cc: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Performance of Java XPath engines
  • Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 06:50:41 -0500

shirasu hiroyuki wrote:

From: shirasu hiroyuki <hirsh AT s9.dion.ne.jp>
Subject: [XOM-interest] Performance of Java XPath engines
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:16:14 +0900 (JST)


Interestiung. Thanks. You note that "Especially the following-sibling traversal of Saxon in DOM is a bit slow, but good in JDOM and XOM." This is an area where I'd expect wide vsaiation between different DOM implementations, depending on the specific strategy they chose to implement operations like getNextSibling. What's true for Xerces might not be true for other DOMs.

--
Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo AT metalab.unc.edu
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page