Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

xom-interest - Re: [XOM-interest] Uncompressed jar (xom-1.0d25.jar) has limited appeal

xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Grant Wood <grant AT nanode.org>
  • To: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Uncompressed jar (xom-1.0d25.jar) has limited appeal
  • Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:11:05 -0600


I know that people who use JNLP to deploy their apps appreciate having smaller jars for users to download, and it seems clear that performance isn't really an issue.

I say compress away.


Grant Wood
Nanode LLC
grant at nanode.org
www.nanode.org

On Mar 24, 2004, at 6:29 AM, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:

I'm flexible on this one since it in no way affects the API or behavior. What does everyonne think? Would you prefer a compressed or uncompressed jar?
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elharo AT metalab.unc.edu
Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/ cafeaulaitA
_______________________________________________
XOM-interest mailing list
XOM-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/xom-interest





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page