XOM API for Processing XML with Java

[Grant Wood <grant AT nanode.org>]

I know that people who use JNLP to deploy their apps appreciate having  
smaller jars for users to download, and it seems clear that performance  
isn't really an issue.

I say compress away.


Grant Wood
Nanode LLC
grant at nanode.org
www.nanode.org

On Mar 24, 2004, at 6:29 AM, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:

> I'm flexible on this one since it in no way affects the API or  
> behavior. What does everyonne think? Would you prefer a compressed or  
> uncompressed jar?
> --  
>
>   Elliotte Rusty Harold
>   elharo AT metalab.unc.edu
>   Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
>   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
>    
> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/ 
> cafeaulaitA
> _______________________________________________
> XOM-interest mailing list
> XOM-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/xom-interest