xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
- To: "Bradley S. Huffman" <hip AT cs.okstate.edu>
- Cc: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:00:48 -0500
At 9:52 AM -0600 3/23/04, Bradley S. Huffman wrote:
I'm not sure it should. I see good points and problems either way. But since
your about to freeze the API, I'm looking for items that may cause problems
down the road and the way setBaseURI is documented and/or implemented just
hits me as a future source of confusion. Hence why I suggested maybe it
shouldn't be public.
Implementing XInclude in a separate package requires that it be public (or that we change the behavior so nodes do remember their original inherited base URI).
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elharo AT metalab.unc.edu
Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap
, (continued)
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap,
jcowan, 03/19/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/21/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap,
Bradley S. Huffman, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap,
Bradley S. Huffman, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/22/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, Bradley S. Huffman, 03/22/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/22/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, Bradley S. Huffman, 03/23/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/23/2004
- [XOM-interest] Preserving base URIs on detachment, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/23/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Preserving base URIs on detachment, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/25/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Preserving base URIs on detachment, Bradley S. Huffman, 03/26/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Preserving base URIs on detachment, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/27/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Preserving base URIs on detachment, John Cowan, 03/27/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Preserving base URIs on detachment, Bradley S. Huffman, 03/27/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap,
Bradley S. Huffman, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap,
Bradley S. Huffman, 03/22/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, Nils_Kilden-Pedersen, 03/23/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, John Cowan, 03/23/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, Mike Fitzgerald, 03/23/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/23/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap,
jcowan, 03/19/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.