xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java

List archive

Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap

From: "Bradley S. Huffman" <hip AT cs.okstate.edu>
To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
Cc: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 09:52:04 -0600

Elliotte Rusty Harold writes:

> If you can tip the scales in the other direction and convince me base
> URIs should survive detachment, that decision may change. As I said
> we weren't confident in our decision. It was more like 55/45.

I'm not sure it should. I see good points and problems either way. But since
your about to freeze the API, I'm looking for items that may cause problems
down the road and the way setBaseURI is documented and/or implemented just
hits me as a future source of confusion. Hence why I suggested maybe it
shouldn't be public.

Brad

[XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, Elliotte Harold - java FAQ, 03/19/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, jcowan, 03/19/2004
  - Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/21/2004
  - Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/22/2004
    - Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, Bradley S. Huffman, 03/22/2004
      - Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/22/2004
        
        Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, Bradley S. Huffman, 03/22/2004
        
        Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/22/2004
        
        Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, Bradley S. Huffman, 03/22/2004
        Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/22/2004
        Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, Bradley S. Huffman, 03/23/2004
        Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/23/2004
        
        [XOM-interest] Preserving base URIs on detachment, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/23/2004
        Re: [XOM-interest] Preserving base URIs on detachment, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/25/2004
        Re: [XOM-interest] Preserving base URIs on detachment, Bradley S. Huffman, 03/26/2004
        
        Re: [XOM-interest] Preserving base URIs on detachment, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 03/27/2004
        Re: [XOM-interest] Preserving base URIs on detachment, John Cowan, 03/27/2004
        Re: [XOM-interest] Preserving base URIs on detachment, Bradley S. Huffman, 03/27/2004
        
        Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, Nils_Kilden-Pedersen, 03/23/2004
        
        Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, John Cowan, 03/23/2004
        Re: [XOM-interest] Builder argument swap, Mike Fitzgerald, 03/23/2004