xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
- To: John Cowan <cowan AT mercury.ccil.org>
- Cc: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings
- Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 14:22:30 -0500
At 2:12 PM -0500 1/2/04, John Cowan wrote:
A distinction without a difference. The actual 8859-1 standards
document (http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/ISO-IR/100.pdf) doesn't
define them either.
Interesting. In that case, should XOM escape all C1 characters when using ISO-8859-1? or the other ISO 8859 sets? Java maps the range 128-159 into the C1 controls (except for TIS-620) but could or do other transcoders behave differently?
The Unicode mapping tables for ISO 8859-1 (and 8859-11) do map the characters from 128-159 onto the Unicode code points 128-159, one to one.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elharo AT metalab.unc.edu
Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA
-
[XOM-interest] Obscure encodings,
Elliotte Harold, 01/01/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings,
John Cowan, 01/01/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 01/02/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings, John Cowan, 01/02/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 01/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 01/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings,
John Cowan, 01/02/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 01/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings,
John Cowan, 01/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 01/02/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 01/03/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings,
John Cowan, 01/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.