xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
- From: John Cowan <cowan AT mercury.ccil.org>
- To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings
- Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 14:12:05 -0500
Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:
> It turns out there is one difference between TIS-620 and ISO-8859-11,
> though nothing that can't be worked around. 8859-11 defines 0xA0 as
> the non-breaking space. TIS-620 does not, leaving this code point
> undefined.
It's an invariant of all 8859-x standards that NBSP is at A0.
> Also interesting, 8859-11 is the only ISO set I've seen that does not
> define 80-9F as the C1 controls. It leaves them undefined, probably
> for compatibility with TIS-620.
A distinction without a difference. The actual 8859-1 standards
document (http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/ISO-IR/100.pdf) doesn't
define them either.
--
John Cowan www.ccil.org/~cowan www.reutershealth.com
jcowan AT reutershealth.com
All "isms" should be "wasms". --Abbie
-
[XOM-interest] Obscure encodings,
Elliotte Harold, 01/01/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings,
John Cowan, 01/01/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 01/02/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings, John Cowan, 01/02/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 01/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 01/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings,
John Cowan, 01/02/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 01/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings,
John Cowan, 01/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 01/02/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 01/03/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Obscure encodings,
John Cowan, 01/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.