unclug AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: UNC Linux Users Group
List archive
- From: Jeremy Portzer <jeremyp AT pobox.com>
- To: UNC Linux Users Group <unclug AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [unclug] Red Hat AS from RHN
- Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 10:08:29 -0400
On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 09:55, John Reuning wrote:
> Do the updated meta files in the update releases, such as the hdlist
> file, mesh with the original packages to make network installations
> work?
>
Yes. The update versions are fully installable. You can think of them
as new "point releases" if you really wanted, ie RHEL 3.1, 3.2, etc.
They just don't use that numbering scheme for some reason.
--Jeremy
--
/---------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Jeremy Portzer jeremyp AT pobox.com trilug.org/~jeremy |
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\---------------------------------------------------------------------/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[unclug] Red Hat AS from RHN,
Jeff Bollinger, 06/09/2004
- Re: [unclug] Red Hat AS from RHN, Brian Payst, 06/09/2004
-
Re: [unclug] Red Hat AS from RHN,
Joe Morris, 06/09/2004
-
Re: [unclug] Red Hat AS from RHN,
Matthew Mauzy, 06/09/2004
- Re: [unclug] Red Hat AS from RHN, Joe Morris, 06/09/2004
-
Re: [unclug] Red Hat AS from RHN,
Matthew Mauzy, 06/09/2004
- Re: [unclug] Red Hat AS from RHN, Matthew Mauzy, 06/09/2004
-
Re: [unclug] Red Hat AS from RHN,
John W. Sopko Jr., 06/09/2004
-
Re: [unclug] Red Hat AS from RHN,
John Reuning, 06/09/2004
- Re: [unclug] Red Hat AS from RHN, Jeremy Portzer, 06/09/2004
- Re: [unclug] Red Hat AS from RHN, Matthew Mauzy, 06/09/2004
-
Re: [unclug] Red Hat AS from RHN,
John Reuning, 06/09/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.