sm-users AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Sourcemage Users List
List archive
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire)
- From: Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>
- To: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- Cc: sm-users AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire)
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:38:09 -0500
I agree with you but sometimes it's not possible to upgrade everday
(dialup for instance), or one's just busy and forgets. No biggie.
Jeremy
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 20:43, Hamish Greig wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> this is amazing, reversion to the working version happened four days ago,
> even
> allowing for tarballs etc, the grimoire has been corrected for three days.
> Don't our users see the test grimoire as fluid and changing ?
> A lot of work can be done in those three days, by my quick count over 80
> submissions have been made to perforce since the original bad upgrade to
> tar.
> I think users of test should be updating daily. They can remove spells from
> the queue if they want to, but the inportant thing is to have the latest
> versions, to recognise that test changes quickly and casting a spell from
> three days ago could cause problems. Granted casting tar exactly three days
> ago would have caused the same problem, but the next day it would have been
> downgraded again.
> OR do I need a logic transfusion from Dr Spock ?
> Hamish
>
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:50, Robin Sheat wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 08:09:15AM -0800, Eric Sandall wrote:
> > > One of our users/gurus noticed this right after it went in, so we
> > > downgraded it fairly soon (I believe it was withing 4 hours or so), so
> > > only people lucky enough to get the one tarball generated between when
> > > it
> > > went in and came out will have this problem. :)
> >
> > Hmm, I have this tar lined up for upgrade. Good thing my system-update
> > was broken and failed after all :)
> >
> > (this appears to be something to do with scummvm_tools which will be
> > bugzilla'd when I have time)
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFAA0048fSufZR6424RAvH6AJ9oGIFezfF4rzHcXzo9gvnA92YeQgCfX+FQ
> sSHR+0YAFawatvULcCJkDB0=
> =oxbB
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Users mailing list
> SM-Users AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-users
-
[SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Ondra Tomecka, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Ondra Tomecka, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Eric Sandall, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Robin Sheat, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Hamish Greig, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Jeremy Kolb, 01/12/2004
- Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire), Hamish Greig, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Robin Sheat, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Hamish Greig, 01/12/2004
- Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire), Robin Sheat, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Hamish Greig, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Ondra Tomecka, 01/13/2004
- Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire), Hamish Greig, 01/13/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Jeremy Kolb, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Hamish Greig, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Robin Sheat, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Eric Sandall, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Ondra Tomecka, 01/12/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.