sm-users AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Sourcemage Users List
List archive
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire)
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-users AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire)
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:43:16 +1100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
this is amazing, reversion to the working version happened four days ago,
even
allowing for tarballs etc, the grimoire has been corrected for three days.
Don't our users see the test grimoire as fluid and changing ?
A lot of work can be done in those three days, by my quick count over 80
submissions have been made to perforce since the original bad upgrade to tar.
I think users of test should be updating daily. They can remove spells from
the queue if they want to, but the inportant thing is to have the latest
versions, to recognise that test changes quickly and casting a spell from
three days ago could cause problems. Granted casting tar exactly three days
ago would have caused the same problem, but the next day it would have been
downgraded again.
OR do I need a logic transfusion from Dr Spock ?
Hamish
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:50, Robin Sheat wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 08:09:15AM -0800, Eric Sandall wrote:
> > One of our users/gurus noticed this right after it went in, so we
> > downgraded it fairly soon (I believe it was withing 4 hours or so), so
> > only people lucky enough to get the one tarball generated between when it
> > went in and came out will have this problem. :)
>
> Hmm, I have this tar lined up for upgrade. Good thing my system-update
> was broken and failed after all :)
>
> (this appears to be something to do with scummvm_tools which will be
> bugzilla'd when I have time)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAA0048fSufZR6424RAvH6AJ9oGIFezfF4rzHcXzo9gvnA92YeQgCfX+FQ
sSHR+0YAFawatvULcCJkDB0=
=oxbB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Ondra Tomecka, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Ondra Tomecka, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Eric Sandall, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Robin Sheat, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Hamish Greig, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Jeremy Kolb, 01/12/2004
- Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire), Hamish Greig, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Robin Sheat, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Hamish Greig, 01/12/2004
- Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire), Robin Sheat, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Hamish Greig, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Ondra Tomecka, 01/13/2004
- Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire), Hamish Greig, 01/13/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Jeremy Kolb, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Hamish Greig, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Robin Sheat, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Eric Sandall, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Users] Upgrade to tar 1.13.92 (testing grimoire),
Ondra Tomecka, 01/12/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.