sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: "Ryan Abrams" <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>
- To: "Nick Jennings" <nkj AT namodn.com>
- Cc: <sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells
- Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 14:21:03 -0500
No worries. :)
It's all good. Though there is now added pressure on the quality of my
implementation. ;)
-Ryan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Jennings" <nkj AT namodn.com>
To: "Ryan Abrams" <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>
Cc: <sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 01:53:41PM -0500, Ryan Abrams wrote:
> > > Great, so you patch the hacked up sorcery spell, fix the symptoms
that
> > > have occured, and pat yourself on the back.
> >
> > Nick,
> >
> > With all due respect, you have /no/ idea how I plan on implementing it.
> > Criticizing my implementation before you even know what it is going to
be
> > makes you look foolish. Especially since I ranted yesterday about NOT
> > patching symptoms instead of causes.
>
> Woah, I am extremely sorry if that is how I came off sounding. When I
> said "you" I wasn't specifically talking about *you* (theoretically).
>
> I was simply addressing the fact that you only seemed to be "fixing
> the problems", the problems which resulted from a attempt at hacking
> a feature into the way spells work.
>
> If you don't plan on going about it that way, I think I was just mislead
> by your message. Sorry if I offended you Ryan.
>
>
> > My decision to try and fix this problem instead of routing around it is
not
> > a personal attack. I don't think I have made it one, and I would
appreciate
> > it if you wouldn't either.
>
> Again, I'm sorry, I didn't mean it to be a personal attack.
>
> - nick
>
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells, Seth Woolley, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells,
Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells,
Nick Jennings, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells,
Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells,
Nick Jennings, 09/09/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells, Nick Jennings, 09/09/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells, Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells, Dufflebunk, 09/09/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells, Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells, Nick Jennings, 09/09/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells, Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells,
Nick Jennings, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells,
Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells,
Nick Jennings, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells,
Dufflebunk, 09/09/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells, Nick Jennings, 09/09/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells, Nick Jennings, 09/09/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.