sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: Nick Jennings <nkj AT namodn.com>
- To: Ryan Abrams <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>
- Cc: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells
- Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 12:35:41 -0700
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 01:53:41PM -0500, Ryan Abrams wrote:
> > Great, so you patch the hacked up sorcery spell, fix the symptoms that
> > have occured, and pat yourself on the back.
>
> Nick,
>
> With all due respect, you have /no/ idea how I plan on implementing it.
> Criticizing my implementation before you even know what it is going to be
> makes you look foolish. Especially since I ranted yesterday about NOT
> patching symptoms instead of causes.
Woah, I am extremely sorry if that is how I came off sounding. When I
said "you" I wasn't specifically talking about *you* (theoretically).
I was simply addressing the fact that you only seemed to be "fixing
the problems", the problems which resulted from a attempt at hacking
a feature into the way spells work.
If you don't plan on going about it that way, I think I was just mislead
by your message. Sorry if I offended you Ryan.
> My decision to try and fix this problem instead of routing around it is not
> a personal attack. I don't think I have made it one, and I would appreciate
> it if you wouldn't either.
Again, I'm sorry, I didn't mean it to be a personal attack.
- nick
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells,
Nick Jennings, 09/08/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells, Seth Woolley, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells,
Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells,
Nick Jennings, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells,
Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells,
Nick Jennings, 09/09/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells, Nick Jennings, 09/09/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells, Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells, Dufflebunk, 09/09/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells, Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells, Nick Jennings, 09/09/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells, Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells,
Nick Jennings, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells,
Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells,
Nick Jennings, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells,
Dufflebunk, 09/09/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells, Nick Jennings, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells,
Nick Jennings, 09/08/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery: stable/devel spells, Nick Jennings, 09/09/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.