Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-sorcery - Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery spell problems

sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Nick Jennings <nkj AT namodn.com>
  • To: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
  • Cc: Nathan Doss <ndoss AT mtlaurel.org>, Seth Woolley <seth AT tautology.org>, sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]sorcery spell problems
  • Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 14:28:36 -0700

On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:07:13PM -0400, Dufflebunk wrote:
> I would suggest that for versionsing, the devel version does not
> /require/ additional version info. But, for stable, there should be
> version info. Since obviously the ISOs will be using stable, but it
> won't have the latest stable, it would be misleading and confusing to
> have the default have the same version (or lack of version and just call
> it stable) as the latest stable, when they are different. Umm... yeah...
> Is that a run on sentence?
>
> That said, I don't see the problem with making the version the day the
> snapshot is made for devel.

That is how I feel as well

>
> I think that's about all I can say on this issue of the sorcery spell
> since I really can't see the problem with writing a spell that works
> properly... of course, I haven't tried either ;)

Uhm, yeah, I won't go into your 'sedit' quick-fix then. :)






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page