sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Bugs for Sorcery are reported here
List archive
- From: bugzilla-daemon AT metalab.unc.edu
- To: sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7472] bi-arch support
- Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 12:46:18 -0400
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7472
------- Additional Comments From eric AT sandall.us 2004-10-10 12:46 -------
I didn't see that code in your Sorcery patches and was wondering where it was
and figured you just hadn't put it up yet. :) The only patch on your site is
this one: http://benoit.papillault.free.fr/sourcemage/sorcery-ld.diff.gz and
it
does not do anything to the compile process of Sorcery, just the LD_SO
settings.
I'm happier to use a separate branch so that if I screw up Andrew doesn't get
mad at me. :) Once it's working Perforce will allow easy re-integration back
into mainline devel.
Why does the native BUILD/INSTALL have to go after non-native?
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-
[SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7472] bi-arch support,
bugzilla-daemon, 10/08/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7472] bi-arch support, bugzilla-daemon, 10/08/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7472] bi-arch support, bugzilla-daemon, 10/08/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7472] bi-arch support, bugzilla-daemon, 10/08/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7472] bi-arch support, bugzilla-daemon, 10/08/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7472] bi-arch support, bugzilla-daemon, 10/08/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7472] bi-arch support, bugzilla-daemon, 10/09/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7472] bi-arch support, bugzilla-daemon, 10/09/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7472] bi-arch support, bugzilla-daemon, 10/09/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7472] bi-arch support, bugzilla-daemon, 10/10/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7472] bi-arch support, bugzilla-daemon, 10/10/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7472] bi-arch support, bugzilla-daemon, 10/10/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.