Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items

[Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>]

On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 11:50:01AM +1100, Hamish Greig wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 02:36, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> > Just noticed this whole discussion goes on on sm-sorcery, which is the
> > wrong list as it's a grimoire not a sorcery issue, forwarding to
> > sm-grimoire.
> >
> > The thread can be found at
> > https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/sm-sorcery/2004-March/001132.html
> 
> Actually it is an issue for both.
> To a greater or lesser degree any team's work affects the other two teams 
> also, this change will require coordination from grimoire team, grimoire 
> branch maintainers, sorcery team and all the devel sorcery and test 
> grimoire 
> users who will iron out the few minor bugs not caught by the extensive 
> testing already done.

It is an issue for both, that's why i forwarded it here. Changing or
extending the spell format definitely should have input from the
grimoire gurus, and the sorcery people have to implement it, so both
need to be involved.

> It supports the recent proposal for a single developers list not the 
> separate 
> quasi-elitist lists currently used. Of course, for this to be achievable,  
> team leads must respect other team's members inputs and stop thinking their 
> team has exclusive rights to discuss their product.

-- 
Arwed v. Merkatz                               Sourcemage GNU/Linux developer
                                                    http://www.sourcemage.org