sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 24280 for review
- From: "Ricardo Izquierdo" <odracir_redwolf AT linuxmail.org>
- To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 24280 for review
- Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 13:32:53 +0800
I agree with Sergey, and also Hamish, i remember the thread talking about cvs
spells. It will be better for the cvs users to use scribbler and scribe
his/her own cvs spell in his personal Grimoire. Modifing the DETAILS.
Also, this si utopic, but it will be great for further iso realeses (post
1.0) that sorcery will allowd to a SMGL user scribe his/her own Grimoire,
instead of loading all the Codex.
Ricardo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2004 20:47:15 -0500
To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 24280 for review
> Just wanted to note that this is very well said. Thank you Hamish!
>
> Sergey.
>
> Hamish Greig wrote:
>
> >that was a seperate issue as I understood it.
> >the first issue was if the change was as small as this cdrdao spell then it
> >should be a PREPARE query not a seperate spell that needs extra
> >maintainance,
> >conflicts, provides and a knowledge of available spells.
> >the second issue that you are referrring to I understood was whether
> >sorcery
> >needed to support cvs/stable version dependent spell scripts within the
> >same
> >spell.
> >I had already stated I thought any restructuring or addditions in this
> >respect
> >should wait until post 1.0 and I had also understood there was agreement
> >that
> >unless the cvs version was warranted due to different DEPENDS, then it
> >should
> >always be integrated. Therefore I had no reason to respond, nor did anyone
> >else ?
> >
> >I think adding PROVIDES, CONFLICTS changing DEPENDS of other spells and
> >actually adding another spell to the grimoire is the less efficient method.
> >A query in PREPARE and a
> >"if ["$CVS" = "YES" ]; then VERSION=FOO-cvs ; else VERSION=FOO; fi"
> >in DETAILS would definitely be the quickest and simplest.
> >Especially if it is not a spell you will be maintaining, then it should be
> >an
> >addition to the original spell. Adding spells means more maintenance, more
> >CONFLICTS and more PROVIDES. Rewriting spells as was discussed doesn't
> >introduce any of these overheads.
> >If I was wrong in my understanding of the previously raped and pillaged
> >thread
> >(I have just reread it, and all it's child threads) then I would actually
> >like to readdress the issue( in a single thread ffs).
> >
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Grimoire mailing list
> SM-Grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-grimoire
--
______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.
Powered by Outblaze
-
[SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 24280 for review,
Hamish Greig, 01/03/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 24280 for review, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/03/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 24280 for review,
Robin Cook, 01/04/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 24280 for review, Hamish Greig, 01/05/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 24280 for review, Eric Sandall, 01/04/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 24280 for review,
Ricardo Izquierdo, 01/04/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 24280 for review, Casey Harkins, 01/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 24280 for review,
Ricardo Izquierdo, 01/05/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 24280 for review, Hamish Greig, 01/05/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.