sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Geoffrey Derber <Geoffrey.Derber AT Trinity.edu>
- To: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- Cc: Source Mage - Grimoire <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend
- Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 17:25:08 -0500
Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
gcc doesn't need to be somewhere as depdency, since basically everything
needs gcc and glibc, afaik, all stuff in the basesystem DEPENDS doesn't
need to be depended on explicitly, all spells not in there need to be
mentioned explicitly as dependencies.
I think for some purposes it might be good to have explicit dependencies for gcc and glibc mentioned. Which spells specifically might need to be worked on, but it could help with ordering of compiles and rebuilds to optimize the order a bit better. Ie, for a rebuild, have gcc be first, have gettext have a dependency on gcc, which is then rebuilt, followed imediately through the trigger with glibc, and working on down the dependency / triggers list.
Geoff
-
[SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend,
Eric Sandall, 06/29/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/29/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/29/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/29/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/29/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/29/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend,
Eric Sandall, 06/29/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend, Eric Womack, 06/29/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend, Robin Cook, 06/29/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend,
Eric Sandall, 06/29/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend, Geoffrey Derber, 06/29/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/29/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/29/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/29/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.