sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: "Source Mage - Grimoire" <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend
- Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 10:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
Hi all,
I would like to know what everyone thinks of using explicit dependencies
rather than implice (xfree86 and gcc)? I just had my install not work for
xdvi because it needs xfree86, but I was not asked to do so (was just
installed linuxdoc or some such).
This would also make our dependency tree more 'stable' in that it would be
a true dependency list.
Thoughts?
-sandalle
--
PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-
[SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend,
Eric Sandall, 06/29/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/29/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/29/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/29/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/29/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/29/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend,
Eric Sandall, 06/29/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend, Eric Womack, 06/29/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend, Robin Cook, 06/29/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend,
Eric Sandall, 06/29/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend, Geoffrey Derber, 06/29/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/29/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/29/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Explicit depend,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/29/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.