sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: "Source Mage - Grimoire" <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 11:43:05 +1000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 07:37, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been thinking (yeah, yeah, I know, bad idea Eric) and I've noticed
> that we have less gurus now than before, with some gurus handling several
> sections at once with other people wanting to add sections (to help lessen
> the number of packages in a section among other reasons). I'd like to see
> what you think of removing guruship for specific sections, setting up a
> list (bugs AT sourcemage.org) which bugzilla sends all NEW bug reports to,
> then any guru can go and assign the bug to him/herself. This way our
> grimoire is more "open" for people to help out in and then we don't have
> sections that are listed as "unmaintained", which not only looks bad, but
> is bad in practice.
>
> Thoughts? Flames? Constructive critisism?
>
> -sandalle
Boy a lot happens when you go to sleep for a few hours!
i had a lot to say about this but it's all been covered so thanks for reading
my mind:-).
I am going to go back to sleep now, could you guys all talk about the ISO for
a few hours? :-)
Hamish
- --
Do You SMuGgLe!?
Linux so advanced it may as well be magic!
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
http://www.sourcemage.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+5oks8fSufZR6424RApL8AJ0Twmh7r1bGTnFlHCwhFAPyQSeTWgCfRyXE
CGSCrzHv+pOK94AEYCznR7I=
=Dv8H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Eric Sandall, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Eric Sandall, 06/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?, Eric Womack, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Seth Woolley, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Eric Sandall, 06/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?, Dufflebunk, 06/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?, Eric Sandall, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Eric Sandall, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Eric Sandall, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Eric Sandall, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Eric Sandall, 06/14/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?, Eric Womack, 06/14/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.