sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.
- From: Javier Vasquez <j.e.vasquez.v AT gmail.com>
- To: "sm, discuss" <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.
- Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 14:13:42 -0600
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Sukneet Basuta <sukneet AT gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You can just get the spell and cast it on top of test. Yes the branch
> name is devel-glibc-2.15 (we just reused the branch for whatever
> reason). I've attached the spell from the branch. Again, it's not well
> tested yet, so you may run into problems with other programs. Please
> submit a bug report if you do.
No problems with glib 2.17...
However it didn't solve anything.
Apparently I can select pentium-m, neither native, as architectures
for this pentium-m laptop, :-(, at least not if I want java enabled
(everything else compiled and installed and apparently works)...
So I'll be reverting to i686, and doing "sorcery -r", to see if I can
get to the state I was before specifying architectures corresponding
to the laptop's processor. Ironically I believed things could only
get better by selecting architectures closer to the processor one.
It'll take like a week, so I won't know till then...
Definitely not what I wanted, but it's taking too much time without success.
Thanks,
--
Javier.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Javier Vasquez, 02/04/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Sukneet Basuta, 02/04/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Javier Vasquez, 02/07/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Sukneet Basuta, 02/07/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Javier Vasquez, 02/09/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Sukneet Basuta, 02/09/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Javier Vasquez, 02/09/2013
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java., Sukneet Basuta, 02/09/2013
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java., Robin Cook, 02/10/2013
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java., Javier Vasquez, 02/10/2013
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java., Robin Cook, 02/10/2013
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java., Javier Vasquez, 02/10/2013
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java., Javier Vasquez, 02/11/2013
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java., Sukneet Basuta, 02/11/2013
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java., Javier Vasquez, 02/15/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Javier Vasquez, 02/09/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Sukneet Basuta, 02/09/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Javier Vasquez, 02/09/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Sukneet Basuta, 02/07/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Javier Vasquez, 02/07/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Sukneet Basuta, 02/04/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.