sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.
- From: Javier Vasquez <j.e.vasquez.v AT gmail.com>
- To: "sm, discuss" <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:55:43 -0600
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Javier Vasquez <j.e.vasquez.v AT gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net> wrote:
>> I was taking about the icedtea-bin-core-7.2.2.1-x86.tar.bz2 file that is
>> used to compile the new version of icedtea7.
>>
>> case "${SMGL_COMPAT_ARCHS[0]}" in
>> ia32|32)
>> SOURCE9=icedtea-bin-core-7.2.2.1-x86.tar.bz2
>> ;;
>> x86-64|64)
>> if [[ "${SMGL_COMPAT_ARCHS[@]/32/}" == "${SMGL_COMPAT_ARCHS[@]}" ]];
>> then
>> SOURCE9=icedtea-bin-core-7.2.2.1-amd64.tar.bz2
>> else
>> SOURCE9=icedtea-bin-core-7.2.2.1-x86.tar.bz2
>> fi
>> ;;
>> *)
>> SOURCE9=icedtea-bin-core-7.2.2.1-x86.tar.bz2
>> ;;
>> esac
>
> Yeap, I got it at first, :-) And yes, I was getting it, at least on
> native... I would guess, the only case missed, which required the
> default would be x86-64 running with 32 bits ABI, but that's just a
> guess, :-)
BTW, the default you added is not needed at all (I just review it
again). As it was, it covered for all X86 cases, pure 32 bits, 64
bits, and 64 bits working with 32 bits ABI.
if you keep the default, that will mean downloading/uncompressing the
X86-32 binaries for non X86 architectures, :-)
Any ways, that was not the problem. The binaries were getting
downloaded/uncompressed.
I'm wondering why on earth was gcj lead to the state of being
considered dying... For now the solution for the penitum-m machine is
to go back to i686...
Thanks,
--
Javier.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Javier Vasquez, 02/07/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Sukneet Basuta, 02/07/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Javier Vasquez, 02/09/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Sukneet Basuta, 02/09/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Javier Vasquez, 02/09/2013
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java., Sukneet Basuta, 02/09/2013
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java., Robin Cook, 02/10/2013
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java., Javier Vasquez, 02/10/2013
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java., Robin Cook, 02/10/2013
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java., Javier Vasquez, 02/10/2013
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java., Javier Vasquez, 02/11/2013
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java., Sukneet Basuta, 02/11/2013
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java., Javier Vasquez, 02/15/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Javier Vasquez, 02/09/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Sukneet Basuta, 02/09/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Javier Vasquez, 02/09/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Sukneet Basuta, 02/07/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss] pentium-m arch + java.,
Javier Vasquez, 02/07/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.